The semantic significance of Donnellan's distinction

Philosophical Studies 37 (3):281 - 288 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf00372449

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Explaining Donnellan's Distinction: A Reply.D. E. Over - 1984 - Analysis 44 (4):191 - 194.
The semantic significance of the referential-attributive distinction.Howard K. Wettstein - 1983 - Philosophical Studies 44 (2):187--96.
Donnellan on neptune.Robin Jeshion - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (1):111-135.
The failure of pragmatic descriptivism.Samuel C. Rickless - manuscript
Donnellan's distinctions.Rod Bertolet - 1986 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64 (4):477 – 487.
Speaker's reference and semantic reference.Saul A. Kripke - 1977 - In Peter A. French, Theodore Edward Uehling & Howard K. Wettstein (eds.), Studies in the philosophy of language. Morris: University of Minnesota, Morris. pp. 255-296.
Conversational implicature and the referential use of descriptions.Thomas D. Bontly - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 125 (1):1 - 25.
Is there such a thing as “semantic content”?Sergeiy Sandler - manuscript
Donnellan's distinction/Kripke's test.Marga Reimer - 1998 - Analysis 58 (2):89–100.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
101 (#173,375)

6 months
6 (#530,265)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rod Bertolet
Purdue University

Citations of this work

Donnellan’s distinction.Michael Devitt - 1981 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 6 (1):511-526.
On a fictional ellipsis.Rod Bertolet - 1984 - Erkenntnis 21 (2):189 - 194.
The epsilon calculus' problematic.B. H. Slater - 1994 - Philosophical Papers 23 (3):217-242.
Does speaker's reference have semantic relevance?David Lumsden - 1985 - Philosophical Studies 47 (1):15 - 21.
Identity, necessity and a prioricity:The fallacy of equivocation.Maria J. Frápolli - 1992 - History and Philosophy of Logic 13 (1):91-109.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references