Poverty: absolute or relative?

Journal of Applied Philosophy 5 (1):27-36 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT In recent decades poverty has been defined as a relative rather than absolute notion. Those in poverty have been seen as poor relative to a level of income, or social condition, accepted as average or normal for a society. Poverty has been redefined as ‘relative deprivation’. This paper argues, first, that the redefinition of poverty as relative to social norms is a radical departure from the traditional notion of poverty. Secondly, it considers whether such a redefinition gives support to the view that the claims of those in poverty (relative) may be considered as morally equivalent to the claims of those in poverty (absolute). The paper concludes by arguing that the notion of relative poverty is advanced to give support to social and economic policies whose primary aim is equality rather than the relief of poverty.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rule Consequentialism and Scope.Leonard Kahn - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (5):631-646.
Absolute informational content.Steven F. Savitt - 1987 - Synthese 70 (February):185-90.
The absolute and the relative in St. Thomas and in modern philosophy.Mary Camilla Cahill - 1939 - Washington, D.C.,: The Catholic University of America Press.
Punishing states that cause global poverty.Thom Brooks - 2007 - William Mitchell Law Review 33 (2):519-32.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
39 (#410,943)

6 months
8 (#370,225)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?