From rehabilitation to penal communication: The role of furlough and visitation within a retributivist framework

Punishment and Society 23 (3):376-393 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Retributivism is one of the most prevalent theories in contemporary penal theory. However, despite its popularity it is frequently argued that too little attention has been paid to the implications of retributivism for prison management and prison life, including prison visits and furlough. More so, it has been questioned both whether the various forms of retributivism found in the philosophical literature on criminal punishment have anything to say about what prison life ought to be like and whether they are able to criticize deeply contested rules and practices, such as those that deny inmates contact with family-members for the sake of prison discipline. In this paper, we argue that prison visits and furlough have a crucial role in a prison system based on retributivist principles. In particular, we argue that the communicative theory of punishment has important theoretical resources for proving a strong and compelling rationale for both furlough and visitation on retributivist grounds. Besides exploring this rationale, we also discuss the practical implications of this view for the penal policy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Prison on Appeal: The Idea of Communicative Incarceration.Alasdair Cochrane - 2017 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (2):295-312.
Making sense of retributivism.J. Angelo Corlett - 2001 - Philosophy 76 (1):77-110.
Retributivism and the Use of Imprisonment as the Ultimate Back-up Sanction.William Bülow - 2019 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 32 (2):285-303.
Alternatives to the Prison.Michel Foucault - 2009 - Theory, Culture and Society 26 (6):12-24.
Retributivism and Fallible Systems of Punishment.George Schedler - 2011 - Criminal Justice Ethics 30 (3):240-266.
Desert of What? On Murphy’s Reluctant Retributivism.Linda Radzik - 2017 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (1):161-173.
A Defense of Retributivism.Stephen Kershnar - 2000 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (1):97-117.
Unintentional Punishment.Adam J. Kolber - 2012 - Legal Theory 18 (1):1-29.
Angola and the Agony of Prison Reform.Robert Perkinson - 2000 - Radical Philosophy Review 3 (1):8-19.
Is Bradley a retributivist?Thom Brooks - 2011 - History of Political Thought 32 (1):83-95.
Say what? A Critique of Expressive Retributivism.Nathan Hanna - 2008 - Law and Philosophy 27 (2):123-150.
Reciprocity as a Justification for Retributivism.Jami L. Anderson - 1997 - Criminal Justice Ethics 16 (1):13-25.
Angola and the Agony of Prison Reform.Robert Perkinson - 2000 - Radical Philosophy Review 3 (1):8-19.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-01-15

Downloads
4 (#1,627,781)

6 months
1 (#1,477,342)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William Bülow O'Nils
Uppsala University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references