Reflections on Brown vs. Board of Education and School Integration Today

The Harvard Review of Philosophy 26:37-57 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Brown vs. Board of Education decision of 1954 mandated school integration. The decision also to recognize that inequalities outside the schools, of both a class- and race-based nature, prevent equality in education. Today, the most prominent argument for integration is that disadvantaged students benefit from the financial, social, and cultural “capital” of middle class families when the children attend the same schools. This argument fails to recognize that disadvantaged students contribute to advantaged students’ educational growth, and sends demeaning messages to the disadvantaged students and messages of unwarranted superiority to the advantaged. Parents, teachers, and schools can adopt a justice perspective that avoids these deleterious aspects of the capital argument, and helps create a community of equals inside the integrated school. Struggles for educational justice must remain closely linked with struggles of both a class- and race-based nature for other forms of justice in the wider society.

Similar books and articles

SSC Result 2017 All Education Board.Rana M. D. Masud - 2017 - Flat Belly Overnight Review By Andrew Raposo 1:24.
Home Education and Social Integration.Christian W. Beck - 2008 - Outlines. Critical Practice Studies 10 (2):59-69.
Suggestion and Its Causes.Leo C. Brown - 1926 - Modern Schoolman 3 (8):129-130.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-09-24

Downloads
440 (#45,105)

6 months
169 (#18,924)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lawrence Blum
University of Massachusetts, Boston

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references