Correction to: Why computer simulations are not inferences, and in what sense they are experiments

European Journal for Philosophy of Science 12 (4):1-2 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,682

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Are computer simulations experiments? And if not, how are they related to each other?Claus Beisbart - 2018 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 8 (2):171-204.
Computer Simulation, Experiment, and Novelty.Julie Jebeile - 2017 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 31 (4):379-395.
Why Monte Carlo Simulations Are Inferences and Not Experiments.Claus Beisbart & John D. Norton - 2012 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 26 (4):403-422.
How can computer simulations produce new knowledge?Claus Beisbart - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (3):395-434.
How to infer explanations from computer simulations.Florian J. Boge - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 82:25-33.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-29

Downloads
12 (#1,105,107)

6 months
8 (#405,070)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Florian J. Boge
Bergische Universität Wuppertal

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references