About Popper-Carnap controversy

Signos Filosóficos 6 (11s):101-114 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper gives a new light on the controversy between Popper and Carnap on the interpretation of probability and its use to solve the problem of induction. In his later work on probability and inductive logic, Carnap came nearer to the bayesian positions stressing an important shift from his ear..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Popper-Carnap controversy.Alex C. Michalos - 1971 - The Hague,: M. Nijhoff.
The Popper—Carnap controversy.J. G. McEvoy - 1976 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 7 (1):63-85.
Alternativas para una fundamentación de la lógica inductiva en R. Carnap.Diego Aísa Moreu - 1973 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 3 (4):523-541.
La probabilidad y la lógica inductiva en Carnap.Eduardo H. Del Busto - 1955 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 3 (1):119-128.
Comments on Ronald Giere.I. J. Good - 1975 - Synthese 30 (1-2):133 -.
Hume, Popper y el problema epistemológico de la inducción.José Andrés Forero Mora - 2012 - Logos: Revista de la Facultad de Filosofia y Humanidades 21:179-191.
KR Popper on Probability and Induction.Rudolf Carnap - 1963 - In Paul Arthur Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. La Salle, Ill., Open Court. pp. 995--998.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-09

Downloads
25 (#636,619)

6 months
8 (#370,225)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references