Institute of Medical Ethics: working party report. HIV infection: the ethics of anonymised testing and of testing pregnant women

Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (4):173-178 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An Institute of Medical Ethics working party supports the view that explicit permission should normally be sought in the case of testing for HIV antibody. It discusses this in relation to anonymised HIV testing for epidemiological purposes, concluding that this is to be welcomed, given certain safeguards. It next argues that pregnant women may have a greater and more immediate need than others to know their HIV status. It concludes that this need does not justify testing them without their permission, but can be met by voluntary diagnostic testing on an 'opting-out' basis, supported by adequate briefing.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,682

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

HIV infection and AIDS: the ethics of medical confidentiality.K. M. Boyd - 1992 - Journal of Medical Ethics 18 (4):173-179.
The ethics of HIV testing by physicians.Timothy F. Murphy - 1993 - Journal of Medical Humanities 14 (3):123-135.
Expensive Medical Techniques. Report of a Working Party.Kenneth M. Boyd - 1984 - Journal of Medical Ethics 10 (1):50-50.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-07

Downloads
15 (#966,573)

6 months
9 (#347,496)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A Walk in the Park: A Case Study in Research Ethics.Zita Lazzarini, Patricia Case & Cecil J. Thomas - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (1):93-103.
A Walk in the Park: A Case Study in Research Ethics.Zita Lazzarini, Patricia Case & Cecil J. Thomas - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (1):93-103.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references