Do Not Risk Homicide: Abortion After 10 Weeks Gestation

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When an abortion is performed, someone dies. Are we killing a human person? Widespread disagreement exists. However, it is not necessary to establish personhood in order to establish the wrongness of abortion: a substantial chance of personhood is enough. We defend The Do Not Risk Homicide Argument: abortions are wrong after 10 weeks gestation because they substantially and unjustifiably risk homicide, the unjust killing of a human person. Why 10 weeks? Because the cumulative evidence establishes a substantial chance (a more than one in five chance) that preborn human beings are persons after 10 weeks (if not before then). We submit evidence from our bad track record, widespread disagreement about personhood (after 10 weeks gestation), problems with theories of personhood, the similarity between preborn human beings and premature newborns, miscalculations of gestational age, and the common intuitive responses of women to their pregnancies and miscarriages. Our argument is cogent because it bypasses the stalemate over preborn personhood and rests on common ground rather than contentious metaphysics. It also strongly suggests that society must do more to protect preborn human beings. We briefly discuss its practical implications for fetal pain relief, social policy, and abortion law.

Similar books and articles

Reconsidering fetal pain.Stuart W. G. Derbyshire & John C. Bockmann - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics Recent Issues 46 (1):3-6.
After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?Alberto Giubilini & Francesca Minerva - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5):261-263.
Fetal Pain, Abortion, Viability, and the Constitution.I. Glenn Cohen & Sadath Sayeed - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (2):235-242.
Abortion and Moral Risk.D. Moller - 2011 - Philosophy 86 (3):425-443.
Fetal Pain, Abortion, Viability, and the Constitution.I. Glenn Cohen & Sadath Sayeed - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (2):235-242.
Abortion, society, and the law.David F. Walbert - 1973 - Cleveland [Ohio]: Press of Case Western Reserve University. Edited by J. Douglas Butler.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-27

Downloads
992 (#14,023)

6 months
283 (#7,955)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matthew Braddock
University of Tennessee, Martin

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Practical Ethics.Peter Singer - 1979 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Susan J. Armstrong & Richard George Botzler.
A defense of abortion.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1971 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1):47-66.
Practical Ethics.Peter Singer - 1979 - Philosophy 56 (216):267-268.
Moral uncertainty and its consequences.Ted Lockhart - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 40 references / Add more references