Well-being and death

New York: Oxford University Press (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Well-Being and Death addresses philosophical questions about death and the good life: what makes a life go well? Is death bad for the one who dies? How is this possible if we go out of existence when we die? Is it worse to die as an infant or as a young adult? Is it bad for animals and fetuses to die? Can the dead be harmed? Is there any way to make death less bad for us? Ben Bradley defends the following views: pleasure, rather than achievement or the satisfaction of desire, is what makes life go well; death is generally bad for its victim, in virtue of depriving the victim of more of a good life; death is bad for its victim at times after death, in particular at all those times at which the victim would have been living well; death is worse the earlier it occurs, and hence it is worse to die as an infant than as an adult; death is usually bad for animals and fetuses, in just the same way it is bad for adult humans; things that happen after someone has died cannot harm that person; the only sensible way to make death less bad is to live so long that no more good life is possible.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

At the hour of death.Kārlis Osis - 1986 - [Alexandria, Va.]: Time-Life Books. Edited by Erlendur Haraldsson.
Current debate on the ethical issues of brain death.Masahiro Morioka - 2004 - Proceedings of International Congress on Ethical Issues in Brain Death and Organ Transplantation:57-59.
The phenomenon of death.Edith Wyschogrod - 1973 - New York,: Harper & Row.
How bad is death?Ben Bradley - 2007 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (1):111-127.
Death.Shelly Kagan - 2012 - New Haven: Yale University Press.
Death.James W. Evra - 1984 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (2).
Death and philosophy.Jeff Malpas & Robert C. Solomon (eds.) - 1998 - New York: Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-09-15

Downloads
339 (#60,594)

6 months
22 (#124,727)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ben Bradley
Syracuse University

Citations of this work

A Simple Analysis of Harm.Jens Johansson & Olle Risberg - 2022 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 9:509-536.
Harming as making worse off.Duncan Purves - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (10):2629-2656.
The Right in the Good: A Defense of Teleological Non-Consequentialism in Epistemology.Clayton Littlejohn - 2018 - In Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij & Jeff Dunn (eds.), Epistemic Consequentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 23-47.
The Good Cause Account of the Meaning of Life.Aaron Smuts - 2013 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 51 (4):536-562.

View all 158 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references