Spontaneous Comparison of Nanotechnology and Controversial Objects among Laypersons, Scientists and Environmentalists

NanoEthics 17 (3):1-8 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Nanotechnologies are a controversial topic, as they seem promising but also cause concern. Previous research has highlighted the potential link between nanotechnologies and other hazardous technologies. The aim of this research was to analyse the discourse on this topic by three groups of participants: laypersons, scientists and environmentalists. Thirty-four people (13 laypersons, ten scientists and eleven environmentalists) were interviewed using a semi-structured interview. Lexical and thematic analyses showed that scientists engage in explanatory discourse and perceive fewer risks than laypersons and environmentalists. The latter two groups describe applications and list the main actors in the development of nanotechnologies. Environmentalists are significantly more likely to make spontaneous associations with other technologies, such as electromagnetic waves, and perceive more risks than the other two groups. Contrary to our expectations, laypersons make fewer associations with biotechnologies than experts or environmentalists. The results are discussed in terms of the interest of a qualitative approach to uncovering new objects spontaneously associated with nanotechnologies, as well as in terms of a risk governance framework.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Gender, Mad Scientists and Nanotechnology.J. Kasi Jackson - 2008 - Spontaneous Generations 2 (1):45.
Cognitive Barriers in Perception of Nanotechnology.Alexei Grinbaum - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (4):689-694.
Conclusion.Fritz Allhoff, Patrick Lin & Daniel Moore - 2010 - In What is Nanotechnology and why does it Matter? Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 254–260.
Environment.Fritz Allhoff, Patrick Lin & Daniel Moore - 2010 - In What is Nanotechnology and why does it Matter? Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 151–169.
Design and Aesthetics in Nanotechnology.Sacha Loeve - 2018 - In Bernadette Bensaude Vincent, Xavier Guchet & Sacha Loeve (eds.), French Philosophy of Technology: Classical Readings and Contemporary Approaches. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 361-384.
“Nanotechnology” as a new keytechnology?—An attempt of a historical and systematical comparison with other technologies.Andreas Woyke - 2007 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 38 (2):329-345.
Nanotechnology.Alfred Nordmann - 2009 - In Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen Friis, Stig Andur Pedersen & Vincent F. Hendricks (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 511–516.
Reading Feynman Into Nanotechnology.Christopher P. Toumey - 2008 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 12 (3):133-168.
Reading Feynman Into Nanotechnology.Christopher P. Toumey - 2008 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 12 (3):133-168.
Nanotechnology — a new field of ethical inquiry?Armin Grunwald - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (2):187-201.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-07

Downloads
10 (#1,198,690)

6 months
10 (#276,350)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?