Equality in 21* with Restricted Subjects

Zeitschrift fur mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 24 (8):125-127 (1978)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Rule of Law and Equality.Paul Gowder - 2013 - Law and Philosophy 32 (5):565-618.
Dimensions of Equality.Dennis Mckerlie - 2001 - Utilitas 13 (3):263.
Reassessing Egalitarianism.Jeremy Moss - 2014 - Palgrave McMillan.
How to Value Equality.Jeremy Moss - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (3):187-196.
Ideals of Equality.Andrew Mason (ed.) - 1998 - Wiley-Blackwell.
Forget about equality.Madison Powers - 1996 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (2):129-144.
A unified approach to restricted games.E. Algaba, J. M. Bilbao & J. J. López - 2001 - Theory and Decision 50 (4):333-345.
Equality does not entail equality across species.Roger Fjellstrom - 2002 - Environmental Ethics 24 (4):339-352.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
30 (#534,634)

6 months
5 (#644,465)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Combinatory logic.Haskell Brooks Curry - 1958 - Amsterdam,: North-Holland Pub. Co..
Combinatory Logic.Haskell B. Curry, J. Roger Hindley & Jonathan P. Seldin - 1977 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 42 (1):109-110.
Elements of combinatory logic.Frederic Brenton Fitch - 1974 - New Haven,: Yale University Press.
The inconsistency of f*21.M. W. Bunder - 1976 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 41 (2):467 - 468.

View all 6 references / Add more references