Theodicy, Regress, and the Problem of Eternal Separation

Journal of Analytic Theology 11:85-109 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The problem of eternal separation is the problem of explaining how someone could be happy in heaven while knowing that his beloved is in hell. Some argue that this problem is insoluble, while others try to solve it through the lover, the beloved, or the love between them. I argue that the problem of eternal separation is really three problems, namely, of suffering, separation, and regret. I show that no existing reply solves these problems simultaneously. I then present a new approach through theodicy. I argue that, if we reflect on what it would take to defeat the suffering from losing one’s beloved to hell, a regress emerges, and an adequate solution to the problem of eternal separation is a solution to this regress. I articulate five replies to the regress and evaluate their prospects. The upshot is a roadmap to defending the traditional Christian view of heaven and hell.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Introduction.Jeanne Peijnenburg & Scott F. Aikin - 2014 - Metaphilosophy 45 (2):139-145.
The Problem of Hell. [REVIEW]Thomas Talbott - 1994 - Review of Metaphysics 48 (2):414-415.
A Normative Regress Problem.Linda Radzik - 1999 - American Philosophical Quarterly 36 (1):35-47.
Karma, rebirth, and the problem of evil.Whitley Kaufman - 2009 - In Kevin Timpe (ed.), Arguing about religion. New York: Routledge. pp. 222.
Karma, Rebirth, and the Problem of Evil.Whitley R. P. Kaufman - 2005 - Philosophy East and West 55 (1):15-32.
Heaven and the Problem of Eternal Separation.Eric Yang - 2017 - In Simon Cushing (ed.), Heaven and Philosophy. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
The Regress Argument for Skepticism.Scott Aikin - 2011-09-16 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 146–151.
Dialecticality and Deep Disagreement.Scott F. Aikin - 2018 - Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences 5 (2):173-179.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-10-26

Downloads
24 (#661,118)

6 months
14 (#185,390)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Donald Bungum
University of Mary

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references