From Disinformation to Mythification: Rethinking Historically the Mythicized Sidapa-Bulan Queer Romance

Banwaan: The Philippine Journal of Folklore 3 (1):1–26 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In 2010s, the love story between Sidapa and Bulan, two oft-described as male gods, widely circulated online and eventually became a folkloric representation about the LGBTQIA+ during the pre-colonial Philippines. But in 2019 this queer mythological romance was exposed to be a hoax. However, instead of dismissing the story altogether for being a hoax, especially given the story’s already irreversible circulation in popular culture today, this paper rather examines the “mythification” of Sidapa-Bulan queer romance as a case for historical rethinking. Drawing from a bricolage of digital, ethnohistorical, and historiographical materials, this paper is divided into four sections. The first section dissects this paper’s conceptual tools: the use of seemingly anachronistic categories of “queer” and “LGBTQIA+,” and how these categories intersect with the concepts of “myth-making” as a sociological (and by extension, historical) phenomenon, and what came to be known as “neo-archiving” (i.e., the use of fiction in response to the gaps in history). The second section explains the paper’s methodology and sources, specifically its use of four historical thinking skills in dissecting the Sidapa-Bulan myth. The third section examines the Sidapa-Bulan myth as a historical case, specifically in terms of sourcing and close reading, corroborating, and contextualizing. And the fourth section attempts to offer, albeit in broad strokes, some potential ways to move forward from the damages caused by the Sidapa-Bulan myth. As such, this paper argues that only by maintaining transparency over its own history, that the Sidapa-Bulan queer romance, as a case of contemporary myth-making (where queer artists, authors, and allies did not merely passively consume the story, but rather actively re-define and appropriate it), can become useful and integral in rethinking and, thus, enriching the Philippine LGBTQIA+ past. But in a practical sense, this paper demonstrates how historical thinking skills can empower the public to detect, dissect, and dispel disinformation today.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is Disinformation?Don Fallis - 2015 - Library Trends 63 (3):401-426.
“Can I Just be a Human?” Reading Lgbtq+ Youths’ Civics Talk-as-Text.Jon M. Wargo - 2022 - Journal of Social Studies Research 46 (1):19-33.
Knowledge and Disinformation.Mona Simion - forthcoming - Episteme:1-12.
How disinformation kills: philosophical challenges in the post-Covid society.Miguel Palomo - 2021 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 43 (2):1-5.
Beyond the visible: Rethinking femininity through the femme assemblage.Hannah McCann - 2018 - European Journal of Women's Studies 25 (3):278-292.
Queer studies and religion.Kent L. Brintnall - 2013 - Critical Research on Religion 1 (1):51-61.
Protecting democracy from disinformation: Implications for a model of communication.Lydia Sánchez & Sergio Villanueva Baselga - 2023 - Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 14 (1):5-20.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-04-11

Downloads
57 (#282,333)

6 months
57 (#82,324)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gregorio III Caliguia
Polytechnic University of the Philippines

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references