Remarks on Popper's note on content and degree of confirmation

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 7 (27):243-244 (1956)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A brand new type of inductive logic: Reply to Diderik Batens.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):248-252.
A second note on degree of confirmation.Karl R. Popper - 1956 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 7 (28):350-353.
Popper’s Measure of Corroboration and P.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (4):axs029.
‘Content’ and ‘Degree of Confirmation’: A Reply to Dr Bar-Hillel.Karl R. Popper - 1955 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 6 (22):157-163.
Non-inductive explication of two inductive intuitions.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 1983 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34 (3):209-223.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
265 (#77,187)

6 months
18 (#143,247)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Notes on probability and induction.Rudolf Carnap - 1973 - Synthese 25 (3-4):269 - 298.
Metaconfirmation.Denis Zwirn & Herv� P. Zwirn - 1996 - Theory and Decision 41 (3):195-228.
The Popper—Carnap controversy.J. G. McEvoy - 1976 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 7 (1):63-85.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references