Should evidence be probable? A comment on Roush

&

Abstract

Working paper

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reply to Grünbaum.Richard Swinburne - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (3):481-485.
A challenge to positive relevance theorists: Reply to Roush.Peter Achinstein - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (4):521-524.
Tracking truth: knowledge, evidence, and science.Sherrilyn Roush - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Probability, credibility and acceptability.Richard G. Swinburne - 1971 - American Philosophical Quarterly 8 (3):275 - 283.
Recursive tracking versus process reliabilism.Alvin I. Goldman - 2009 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (1):223-230.
Does Roush show that evidence should be probable?Damien Fennell & Nancy Cartwright - 2010 - Synthese 175 (3):289 - 310.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
23 (#684,863)

6 months
1 (#1,475,915)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references