On the Immorality of Tattoos

The Journal of Ethics 24 (2):193-206 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Tattoos are widely regarded as morally neutral, and the decision to have them as carrying no ethical implications. The aim of this paper is to question this assumption. I argue that decisions to have tattoos involve risks that are not merely prudential—they are normative. The argument starts with a thesis that the power we presently have over our lives is constrained by the need to respect our future selves. If we make a discretionary choice that disregards our future interests and preferences, then, under certain circumstances, we can be morally to blame. I argue that certain decisions to get tattoos fit this description. Therefore, getting some tattoos makes us blameworthy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Las máscaras del sí mismo.Jacinto Choza - 1993 - Anuario Filosófico 26 (2):375-394.
Le tatouage : média de la culture polynésienne.Florence Lamy - 2013 - Hermès: La Revue Cognition, communication, politique 65 (1):, [ p.].
The harm of immorality.Paul Bloomfield - 2008 - Ratio 21 (3):241-259.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-29

Downloads
81 (#207,736)

6 months
16 (#160,013)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matej Cibik
University of Pardubice

References found in this work

A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals.Immanuel Kant - 1785 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Thomas E. Hill & Arnulf Zweig.
Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1962 - Proceedings of the British Academy 48:187-211.
Mortal questions.Thomas Nagel - 1979 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 19 references / Add more references