Competence and Inequity Are Both Important to the Ethics of Supervised Injectable Opioid Assisted Treatment

American Journal of Bioethics 17 (12):41-43 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I very much enjoyed reading the interesting and original article by Steel and colleagues (2017). But I found myself strongly disagreeing with its conclusion once the real point of the argument became clear to me. At the same time, I believe that the authors are correct to draw attention to the importance of context and inequities in framing discussions of the ethics of voluntary consent in heroin prescription research. I begin with a brief summary of the authors’ conclusion, quoting directly and adding my own emphases, since there are major philosophical points I wish to make that hinge on nuances in wording...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is supervised community treatment ethically justifiable?E. Dale - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (5):271-274.
Depression and competence to refuse psychiatric treatment.A. Rudnick - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (3):151-155.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-18

Downloads
44 (#368,251)

6 months
2 (#1,236,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?