Review of Raskin (2008): The Primer of Humor Research [Book Review]

Pragmatics and Cognition 19 (2):357-365 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1075/pc.19.2.09cha

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The interdisciplinary field of humor research.Victor Raskin - 1987 - Semiotica 66 (4):441-449.
Descortesía y humor fallido en conversaciones entre hombres y mujeres.M. Belén Alvarado Ortega - 2016 - Pragmática Sociocultural 4 (2):243-267.
Humor From The Perspective Of Positive Psychology. Implications For Research On Development In Adulthood.Anna Radomska - 2011 - Polish Psychological Bulletin 42 (4):215-225.
Non-literalness and non-bona-fîde in language: An approach to formal and computational treatments of humor.Jonathan D. Raskin & Salvatore Attardo - 1994 - Pragmatics and Cognition 2 (1):31-69.
Non-literalness and non-bona-fîde in language: An approach to formal and computational treatments of humor.Victor Raskin & Salvatore Attardo - 1994 - Pragmatics and Cognition 2 (1):31-69.
The rejection of humor in western thought.John Morreall - 1989 - Philosophy East and West 39 (3):243-265.
Nietzsche, Humor and Masochism.Beau Shaw - 2015 - Israeli Journal for Humor Research 4 (2):31-50.
Humor and Enlightenment, Part II: The Theory Applied.Peter H. Karlen - 2016 - Contemporary Aesthetics 14.
"How Humor Works" Introduction - The "Holy Grail" Humor Theory in One Page.E. Garrett Ennis - manuscript
Does God Have a Sense of Humor?Rik Peels - 2015 - Faith and Philosophy 32 (3):271-292.
Humor and Enlightenment, Part I: The Theory.Peter H. Karlen - 2016 - Contemporary Aesthetics 14.
Comic relief: a comprehensive philosophy of humor.John Morreall - 2009 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Racist Humor.Luvell Anderson - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (8):501-509.
But the comic situations in writers such as Shakespeare and Chaucer may have forced new understandings of humor. Although some of their humor can be seen as “relief 'there are other kinds of humor as well. Thomas Hobbes introduced what can be called the superiority or disparagement theory of humor. He does not, however, speak approvingly of it”. [REVIEW]Glenn C. Joy - 2003 - Southwest Philosophical Studies 25:31.
How Many Feminists Does It Take To Make A Joke? Sexist Humor and What's Wrong With It.Memo Bergmann - 1986 - Hypatia 1 (1):63-82.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-18

Downloads
10 (#1,199,765)

6 months
1 (#1,478,500)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references