Abstract

For recent academic thinking Luo River late Ming literary trends of romance generated a considerable extent. Therefore, to clarify how the Luo River near view "feeling" of this concept, the study will be of particular significance. Purpose of this paper will be near the river in the Law "affective" and "passion" concept, the meaning of the distinction between discussion and to complement the academic Roche "feeling" the inadequacy of the concept of research. In terms of research methods, starting from the original Code, within the original Code, the significance of the relationship between the main arguments of the Roche "affective" and "passion" to distinguish between two concepts are discussed. Concluded that the discussion of this distinction, not only to clarify the Luo River near the "feeling" the view will also help the future of our literature, such as Tang, "love to" re-thinking of understanding and interpretation. Jin-xi Lou's academic thought contributed to a certain degree to the emergence of romantic literature in the late Ming Dynasty. Therefore, it is particularly significant in terms of research to clarify how Jin-xi Lou saw the concept of qing. This paper is meant to explore and distinguish between the concept of qingxing and the concept of qingyu as a supplement to the insufficient research on Lou's concept of qing in the academic world. About the methodology, we will work from the texts themselves, and the argument will be based on the relationships among all the texts with regard to their meanings, stating respectively the concepts of qingxing and qingyu. In the end, it will be pointed out that these respective statements not only clarity Lou's view about qing but also help us re-understand and re -interpret the thought of qingzhi of the great writer Xian-zu Tang