Psychiatric Nursing and Electroconvulsive Therapy

Nursing Ethics 2 (4):321-331 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Sufficient doubt surrounds electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) to warrant nurses opting out of its administration and/or advising patients that it may be only one of a range of treatments open to them. In the latter respect, this discussion touches on aspects of the concept of advocacy. Relationships with the medical profession are also considered, as is the indefatigable attention given to issues of 'professional status' by nurses; this preoccupation facilitates an avoidance of therapeutic/advocacy issues

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Does electroconvulsive therapy cause brain damage?Richard D. Weiner - 1984 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (1):1-22.
The Lived Experience of Nursing Advocacy.Robert G. Hanks - 2008 - Nursing Ethics 15 (4):468-477.
Electroconvulsive therapy and the fear of deviance.James Giles - 2002 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 32 (1):61–87.
Some perspectives on electroconvulsive therapy.T. George Bidder - 1984 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (1):22-23.
Electroconvulsive therapy, pharmacotherapy, and psychotherapy.L. Salzman - 1984 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (1):33-33.
The justification for electroconvulsive therapy.Conrad M. Swartz - 1984 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (1):37-38.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-09

Downloads
27 (#592,811)

6 months
4 (#798,951)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The task of nursing ethics.K. M. Melia - 1994 - Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (1):7-11.
The Loony-Bin Trip.Kate Millett - 1993 - Hypatia 8 (1):197-204.

Add more references