The Myth of Consciousness: The Reality of Brain-Sign

Journal of Neurophilosophy 1 (2) (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The physical sciences, as generally understood, are disciplines concerned with the characteristics and behavior of physical objects and states. What is evident about the current condition of consciousness is that: 1) It has no identified physical states; 2) There is no generally accepted vocabulary of its functioning, or its participant entities; and 3) No ‘normal science’ operative structure upon which a community of scientists agree. The reasons are that consciousness is a prescientific concept persisting because there is no adequate physicalist theory to replace it, and because biology operates in a way ‘invisible’ to assumed mental processes and vocabulary. What is required is a plausible theory built on a biophysical base. A theory is being developed: it is termed the _theory of brain-sign_. Brain-sign replaces consciousness as an evolved neural operation in which brains communicate with each other in the collective action of organisms, so addressing the limitations of being an isolated individual. It depends upon neural signification, in this case of the organisms’ immediate _causal orientation_ towards the world. Thus, multiple organisms are linked as one biophysical operation. Signs are biologically ubiquitous and inherently physical. Organisms are not subjective agents with transcendent powers acting in a perceivable world, but evolved organic objects with the ability to cooperate as one overarching biological process. It is anticipated this theoretical operation and vocabulary will explain brain function, which mind fails to do. It accounts for science from both its neural origins and its communal nature. ER -

Similar books and articles

What is “mythic reality”?Robert A. Segal - 2011 - Zygon 46 (3):588-592.
Quantum Mechanics, Objective Reality, and the Problem of Consciousness.R. Mukhopadhyay - 2014 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 21 (11-12):57-80.
The Possibility of Empirical Test of Hypotheses About Consciousness.Jean E. Burns - 1996 - In Stuart R. Hameroff, Alfred W. Kaszniak & Alwyn Scott (eds.), Towards a Science of Consciousness. MIT Press. pp. 739--742.
Does Consciousness Perform a Function Independently of the Brain?Jean E. Burns - 1991 - Frontier Perspectives, Center for Frontier Sciences, Temple University 2 (1):19-34.
On seeking the mythical fountain of consciousness.Jeffrey Foss - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):682-682.
Brain, mind, and the structure of reality.Paul L. Nunez - 2010 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Brain and Mind.David A. Oakley (ed.) - 1985 - New York: Methuen.
Myth, Primitive Sign, Poetry: From Cassirer to Heidegger.Robert S. Leib - 2018 - Research in Phenomenology 48 (2):244-264.
The limits of neuropsychological models of consciousness.Max Velmans - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):702-703.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-01

Downloads
182 (#108,858)

6 months
88 (#54,527)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Philip Clapson
Birkbeck, University of London

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations