Who Do We Think We Are?

Social Philosophy Today 32:29-44 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper begins to develop a conception of ecological subjectivity and hence of social-political practice that can promote social justice across diverse populations and situations. It urges a provocative posing of the question “who do we think we are?” to direct attention to often unspoken assumptions about subjectivity and agency that tend silently to inform current philosophical inquiry. Drawing attention to the often-unconscious processes of “we-saying.” it aims to highlight and to prompt contestation of the silent assumptions that tend to inform that “we.” In so doing, it appeals to humility as an epistemic and moral virtue.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Advance Directives in Canada.Alister Browne & Bill Sullivan - 2006 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 15 (3):256-260.
Advance Directives and Personal Identity: What Is the Problem?E. Furberg - 2012 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (1):60-73.
The legal advance of the advance directive.Stuart Hornett - 1994 - Ethics and Medicine: A Christian Perspective on Issues in Bioethics 10 (2):25.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-07-29

Downloads
59 (#273,661)

6 months
9 (#317,143)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?