Is it as Simple as "E-Teaching Good" Versus "Standardised Teaching Bad"?

Constructivist Foundations 18 (2):286-288 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While sympathetic to much of what the authors of the target article write, I claim that there is a binary in their thinking, i.e., the one in the title of my commentary. I argue that such binaries obscure some groups and, in this case, one thing relatively hidden is the role of the teacher, in the lessons described. An alternative to positing an opposition between teaching approaches would be to apply the principles of “E-teaching” to working with teachers, as well as students.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Trust issues.Rodger Jackson - 2015 - The Philosophers' Magazine 69:77-82.
Is Clarity Essential to Good Teaching?Mason Marshall & Aaron M. Clark - 2010 - Teaching Philosophy 33 (3):271-289.
Teaching as a profession: an essay in the philosophy of education.Glenn Langford - 1978 - Manchester [Eng.]: Manchester University Press.
Concepts of teaching.C. J. B. Macmillan - 1968 - Chicago,: Rand McNally. Edited by Thomas W. Nelson.
The Logics of Good Teaching in an Audit Culture: A Deleuzian analysis.Greg Thompson & Ian Cook - 2013 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 45 (3):243-258.
Introduction.C. L. Hardin - 1995 - Teaching Philosophy 18 (4):327-331.
The future of teaching.Xudong Zhu & Michael Peters (eds.) - 2023 - Boston: Brill.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-27

Downloads
3 (#1,714,622)

6 months
2 (#1,204,205)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references