Can Standpoint Epistemology Avoid Inconsistency, Circularity, and Unnecessariness? A Comment on Ashton’s Remarks about Epistemic Privilege

Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2 (11):29-41 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Epistemic Circularity: Vicious, Virtuous and Benign.John Greco - 2011 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 1 (2):105-112.
Recent Work in Standpoint Epistemology.Briana Toole - 2021 - Analysis 81 (2):338-350.
Reflective Knowledge and Epistemic Circularity.C. S. I. Jenkins - 2011 - Philosophical Papers 40 (3):305-325.
Knowledge, doubt, and circularity.Baron Reed - 2012 - Synthese 188 (2):273-287.
Knowledge and social identity.Briana Marie Toole - 2021 - Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin
Standpoint Theory.Alison Wylie - 1995 - In Robert Audi (ed.), Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. New York City: Cambridge University Press. pp. 1021-1022.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-06

Downloads
471 (#41,377)

6 months
201 (#14,030)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Add more citations