Can Science Be Objective? Longino's Science as Social Knowledge

Hypatia 8 (3):194-201 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

InScience as Social Knowledge, Helen Longino offers a contextual analysis of evidential relevance. She claims that this “contextual empiricism” reconciles the objectivity of science with the claim that science is socially constructed. I argue that while her account does offer key insights into the role that values play in science, her claim that science is nonetheless objective is problematic.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,682

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A defense of Longino's social epistemology.K. Brad Wray - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (3):552.
On the Social Nature of Objectivity: Helen Longino and Justin Biddle.Jaana Eigi - 2015 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 30 (3):449-463.
Book Review: What’s So Social about Social Knowledge? [REVIEW]Warren Schmaus - 2005 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (1):98-125.
Amending and defending Critical Contextual Empiricism.Kirstin Borgerson - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 1 (3):435-449.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-02-07

Downloads
190 (#106,269)

6 months
5 (#686,768)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sharon Crasnow
Riverside Community College

References found in this work

Scientific Realism.Richard Boyd - 1984 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 21 (1&2):767-791.

Add more references