Phenomenological Realism Versus Scientific Realism: Reinhardt Grossmann - David M. Armstrong Metaphysical Correspondence

De Gruyter (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The two eminent metaphysicians Armstrong and Grossmann exchanged letters for ten years in which they discussed crucial points of their respective ontologies. They have a common basis. Both do metaphysics proper and not linguistic philosophy. Both advocate universals and acknowledge the key position of the category of states of affairs. However, they differ on the simplicity of universals and the nature of states of affairs. There is also a fundamental methodological disagreement between them. Armstrong accepts only the evidence of natural science and has a materialist view on mind while Grossmann is a dualist and grants also the same evidential status to the phenomenological data of perception and introspection. The letters are grouped into three phases. The first is the issue of universals, the second the ontological analysis of laws of nature and the third the ontology of numbers. The book contains also longer comments and reviews, partly not published until now.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Horwich on 'semantic' and 'metaphysical' realism.David Davies - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (4):539-557.
Armstrong on Relational and Nonrelational Realism.Gail Fine - 1981 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62 (3):262-71.
Semantic Challenges to Scientific Realism.Holger Andreas - 2011 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 42 (1):17 - 31.
Aberrations of the realism debate.Michael Devitt - 1991 - Philosophical Studies 61 (1-2):43--63.
Realism Versus Realism.Chhanda Gupta - 2002 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Realism: Metaphysical, Scientific, and Semantic.Panu Raatikainen - 2014 - In Kenneth R. Westphal (ed.), Realism, Science, and Pragmatism. Routledge. pp. 139-158.
Primordial Realism.J. L. Schellenberg - 2021 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 45:483-504.
Putnam’s no Miracles Argument.Marco Bastianelli - 2021 - European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 13 (2).

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-08

Downloads
18 (#835,873)

6 months
13 (#198,663)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Javier Cumpa
Complutense University of Madrid

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references