A Loophole of All ‘Loophole-Free’ Bell-Type Theorems

Foundations of Science 25 (4):971-985 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Bell’s theorem cannot be proved if complementary measurements have to be represented by random variables which cannot be added or multiplied. One such case occurs if their domains are not identical. The case more directly related to the Einstein–Rosen–Podolsky argument occurs if there exists an ‘element of reality’ but nevertheless addition of complementary results is impossible because they are represented by elements from different arithmetics. A naive mixing of arithmetics leads to contradictions at a much more elementary level than the Clauser–Horne–Shimony–Holt inequality.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,682

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Conway–Kochen and the Finite Precision Loophole.Ronnie Hermens - 2014 - Foundations of Physics 44 (10):1038-1048.
Charting the labyrinth of Bell-type theorems.Tomasz Placek - 1997 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 5:93-120.
The Scope and Generality of Bell’s Theorem.James Owen Weatherall - 2013 - Foundations of Physics 43 (9):1153-1169.
On the Validity of Clauser and Horne Factorizability.A. Garuccio & V. Berardi - 2003 - Foundations of Physics 33 (4):657-664.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-15

Downloads
31 (#527,721)

6 months
19 (#145,038)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?