Where Does Life Begin? Discerning the Impact of Dobbs on Assisted Reproductive Technologies

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 51 (3):518-527 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article explores the impact of Dobbs on access to assisted reproductive technologies. Clinical aspects of IVF, including embryo discard and cryopreservation, preimplantation genetic testing, and selective reduction of multiple pregnancy are potentially jeopardized by a new legal landscape that protects embryos over the interest of infertility patients.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/jme.2023.133

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Framing gestation: assistance, delegation, and beyond.Ji-Young Lee - 2022 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (7):448-449.
The limitations of liberal reproductive autonomy.J. Y. Lee - 2022 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 25 (3):523-529.
Rethinking radical politics in the context of assisted reproductive technology.Jennifer Parks - 2008 - Bioethics 23 (1):20-27.
Legal conceptions: the evolving law and policy of assisted reproductive technologies.Susan L. Crockin - 2010 - Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Edited by Howard Wilbur Jones.
Invisible women in reproductive technologies: Critical reflections.Piyali Mitra - 2018 - Indian Journal of Medical Ethics 3 (2):NS: 113-9.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology: Regulating the Reproductive Revolution.Robert Gregory Lee & Derek Morgan - 2001 - Blackstone Press.
Legal issues of maternity and inheritance for the biotech child of the 21st century.Kristine S. Knaplund - unknown
From the Middle Ages to the 21st Century. Abortion, Assisted Reproduction Technologies and LGBT Rights in Argentina.Florencia Luna - unknown
Gender, citizenship and human reproduction in contemporary Italy.Patrick Hanafin - 2006 - Feminist Legal Studies 14 (3):329-352.
Assisted Reproductive Technology in Spain: Considering Women's Interests.Inmaculada de Melo-martín - 2009 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 18 (3):228.
The new reproductive technologies: Defying God's Dominion?Maura Anne Ryan - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (4):419-438.
Which “New Eugenics”? Expanding Access to Art, Respecting Procreative Liberty, and Protecting the Moral Equality of All Persons in an Era of Neoliberal Choice.Karey Harwood - 2020 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 13 (2):148-173.
Embodied Progress: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception.Sarah Franklin - 1997 - Psychology Press.
Symposium on HIV and assisted reproductive technologies-Use of assisted reproductive technology to reduce the risk of transmission of HIV in discordant couples wishing to have their own children.H. W. G. Baker, A. Mijch, S. Garland, S. Crowe, M. Dunne, D. Edgar, G. Clarke, P. Foster & J. Blood - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (6):315-320.
Procreative Autonomy Versus Beneficence in Assisted Reproductive Technologies.Sorin Hostiuc - 2020 - Balkan Journal of Philosophy 12 (1):25-30.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-14

Downloads
12 (#1,090,574)

6 months
12 (#220,388)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references