What independent random utility representations are equivalent to the IIA assumption?

Theory and Decision 80 (3):495-499 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper discusses random utility representations of the Luce model. Earlier works, such as McFadden, Yellott, and Strauss have discussed random utility representations under the assumption that utilities are additively separable in a deterministic and a random part. Under various conditions, they have established that a separable and independent random utility representation exists if and only if the random terms are type III extreme value distributed. This paper analyzes independent random utility representations without the separability condition and with an infinite universal set of alternatives. Under these assumptions, it turns out that the most general random utility representation of the Luce model is a utility function that is an arbitrary strictly increasing transformation of a separable utility function with extreme value distributed random terms.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Elements of Chance.R. Duncan Luce & A. A. J. Marley - 2000 - Theory and Decision 49 (2):97-126.
What is a Random String?Cristian Calude - 1995 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 3:101-113.
Invariant multiattribute utility functions.Ali E. Abbas - 2010 - Theory and Decision 68 (1-2):69-99.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-03

Downloads
39 (#410,943)

6 months
10 (#276,350)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A law of comparative judgment.L. L. Thurstone - 1927 - Psychological Review 34 (4):273-286.
A law of comparative judgment.L. L. Thurstone - 1994 - Psychological Review 101 (2):266-270.

Add more references