Holding Up a Democratic Facade: How ‘New Work Organizations’ Avoid Resistance and Litigation When Dismissing Their Managers

Frontiers in Psychology 13 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

New work is used as a general term to summarize professional developments in contemporary work style, structure and modus of organizations and society—this means collaborative work and flexible working hours on individual levels, and flat hierarchies and participatory decision-making on organizational levels. Contemporary corporations strive to orient toward the concept of new work to keep up with stakeholder demands, for instance in their branding strategies as an employer. However, studies on organizational practices indicate that alongside explicit values and agendas, organizations tend to slyly exert power to secure their interests. Constructive dismissal is one such instance where contractually protected employees are made to resign their positions because the work environment is altered to become increasingly unbearable. This research analyzes two case studies to explicate routine dismissal procedures at the managerial level in two internationally operating German corporations. Both corporations explicitly profile as new work environments and are structured according to democratic principles including flat hierarchies, feature institutionalized diversity management including control committees for equal opportunities, and emphasize values such as workplace dignity, employee agency, and equality. The data contain long-term participatory observation collected over a 6-month period from two managers of 5 and 8 years of experience in managerial duties. The content analysis of data reveals characteristics of everyday processes in these organizations especially in terminating managers. The findings are presented as the ‘model of the silent dismissal,’ containing seven types of managerial termination carried out by implicit power and symbolic conventions that circumvent subject participation and litigation in an effortless manner. After exposing the model’s mechanisms, we turn to discuss its meaning for both terminated and surviving subjects against a critical theoretical framework of neoliberalism, democracy, and power.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Virtue at Work: Ethics for Individuals, Managers, and Organizations.Geoff Moore - 2017 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
On the Importance of Getting Things Done.Jane Mansbridge - 2012 - Las Torres de Lucca: Revista Internacional de Filosofía Política 1 (1):57-82.
The Public Health Value of Opioid Litigation.Rebecca L. Haffajee - 2020 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 48 (2):279-292.
Demos.Christian Hillgruber - 2019 - In Ludger Kühnhardt & Tilman Mayer (eds.), The Bonn Handbook of Globality: Volume 2. Springer Verlag. pp. 1039-1049.
Situated Techno-Ethics in Businesses.Katia Dupret - 2015 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 34 (1):71-94.
Standard Gettier Cases: A Problem for Greco?Shane Ryan - 2014 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 90 (1):201-212.
Uaná Volunteering: A Management Program.Norman de Paula Arruda Filho - 2019 - In Christopher Stehr, Nina Dziatzko & Franziska Struve (eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility in Brazil: The Future is Now. Springer Verlag. pp. 331-343.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-05-07

Downloads
13 (#1,040,625)

6 months
9 (#315,924)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Plato: Complete Works.J. Cooper & D. S. Hutchinson - 1998 - Phronesis 43 (2):197-206.
The uneasy relationship between democracy and capital.Thomas Christiano - 2010 - Social Philosophy and Policy 27 (1):195-217.
Decent Termination in advance.Tae Wan Kim - 2014 - Business Ethics Quarterly 24 (2):203-227.
A Defense of Just Cause Dismissal Rules.John J. McCall - 2003 - Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (2):151-175.

View all 8 references / Add more references