Criteria for Assessing AI-Based Sentencing Algorithms: A Reply to Ryberg

Philosophy and Technology 37 (1):1-4 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s13347-024-00722-2

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Criminal Justice and Artificial Intelligence: How Should we Assess the Performance of Sentencing Algorithms?Jesper Ryberg - 2024 - Philosophy and Technology 37 (1):1-15.
Sentencing and Artificial Intelligence.Jesper Ryberg & Julian V. Roberts - 2022 - Oxford: OUP.
Sentencing Disparity and Artificial Intelligence.Jesper Ryberg - 2023 - Journal of Value Inquiry 57 (3):447-462.
Justice by Algorithm: The Limits of AI in Criminal Sentencing.Isaac Taylor - 2023 - Criminal Justice Ethics 42 (3):193-213.
Abolish! Against the Use of Risk Assessment Algorithms at Sentencing in the US Criminal Justice System.Katia Schwerzmann - 2021 - Philosophy and Technology 1:1-22.
Abolish! Against the Use of Risk Assessment Algorithms at Sentencing in the US Criminal Justice System.Katia Schwerzmann - 2021 - Philosophy and Technology 34 (4):1883-1904.
Predictive Sentencing: Normative and Empirical Perspectives.Jan W. De Keijser, Julian V. Roberts & Jesper Ryberg (eds.) - 2019 - Hart Publishing.
Principled Sentencing and Artificial Intelligence.Julian Roberts & Jesper Ryberg (eds.) - 2022 - Oxford University Press.
Risk-Based Sentencing and Predictive Accuracy.Jesper Ryberg - 2020 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 23 (1):251-263.
Neuroethics and Criminal Justice.Jesper Ryberg & Thomas Søbir Petersen - 2016 - In Kasper Lippert‐Rasmussen, Kimberley Brownlee & David Coady (eds.), A Companion to Applied Philosophy. Chichester, UK: Wiley. pp. 370–382.
Exploring the Theory and Practice of Sentencing Reform.Brian Ostrom & Roger Hanson - 2016 - Criminal Justice Ethics 35 (1):80-86.
The ethics of sentencing white-collar criminals.Phillip Balsmeier & Jennifer Kelly - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (2):143 - 152.
Predicting Proportionality: The Case for Algorithmic Sentencing.Vincent Chiao - 2018 - Criminal Justice Ethics 37 (3):238-261.
Can a Machine Sentence Justly?Aziz Z. Huq - 2022 - Criminal Justice Ethics 41 (3):268-277.
Proportionate Sentencing: Exploring the Principles.Andrew Von Hirsch & Andrew Ashworth - 2005 - Oxford University Press UK.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-02-18

Downloads
30 (#535,245)

6 months
30 (#106,810)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas Douglas
University of Oxford

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Moral Uncertainty and the Criminal Law.Christian Barry & Patrick Tomlin - 2019 - In Larry Alexander & Kimberly Kessler Ferzan (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Ethics and the Criminal Law. Springer Verlag. pp. 445-467.

Add more references