How Biology Shapes Philosophy: New Foundations for Naturalism by Livingstone Smith, David (ed.) [Book Review]

Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture 1 (2):149-152 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.26613/esic.1.2.61

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,674

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

How Biology Shapes Philosophy: New Foundations for Naturalism. [REVIEW]Anton Killin - 2017 - Philosophical Quarterly 68 (272):635-638.
How Biology Shapes Philosophy: New Foundations for Naturalism.David Livingstone Smith (ed.) - 2016 - Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Philosophy of biology: Naturalistic or transcendental?Filip Kolen & Gertrudis Van de Vijver - 2007 - Acta Biotheoretica 55 (1):35-46.
Philosophy of Biology.Ingo Brigandt - 2011 - In Steven French & Juha Saatsi (eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to the Philosophy of Science. London: Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 246-267.
Transcendental niche construction.Werner Callebaut - 2007 - Acta Biotheoretica 55 (1):73-90.
What philosophy of biology should be: Rosenberg, McShea: Philosophy of biology. A contemporary introduction. Routledge, 2008.Thomas Pradeu - 2011 - Biology and Philosophy 26 (1):119-127.
Philosophy of Biology.Emanuele Serrelli - 2016 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
What is Darwinian naturalism?Tim Lewens - 2005 - Biology and Philosophy 20 (4):901-912.
David Hull.Peter Godfrey-Smith - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (5):749-753.
Philosophy of biology, German styleReview of Ulrich Krohs and Georg Toepfer : Philosophie der Biologie: Eine Einführung [Philosophy of Biology: An Introduction].Thomas A. C. Reydon - 2007 - Biology and Philosophy 22 (4):619-626.
Is it a revolution?Peter Godfrey-Smith - 2007 - Biology and Philosophy 22 (3):429-437.
A review of David Hull, science and selection: Essays on biological evolution and the philosophy of science. [REVIEW]Stephen M. Downes - 2002 - Biology and Philosophy 17 (5):739-742.
Again, what the philosophy of biology is not.Werner Callebaut - 2005 - Acta Biotheoretica 53 (2):93-122.
Critical review: Sober's Philosophy of biology and his philosophy of biology.Alex Rosenberg - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (3):452-464.
Teleology without tears: Naturalism, neo-naturalism, and evaluationism in the analysis of function statements in biology (and a bet on the twenty-first century).K. W. M. Fulford - 2000 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 7 (1):77-94.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-08-28

Downloads
19 (#817,864)

6 months
9 (#349,017)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references