Descartes and the Crazy Argument

Abstract

In Meditation I, Descartes dismisses the possibility that he might be insane as a ground for doubting that the senses are a source of knowledge of the external world. In this paper, I argue that Descartes was justified in so doing, and draw some general epistemological conclusions from this result.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Descartes.Akinori Hayashi - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 16:133-140.
Almog's Descartes.Fred Ablondi - 2005 - Philosophy 80 (3):423-431.
Cómo resolver la problemática pirrónica: lo que se aprende de Descartes.Ernesto Sosa - 1996 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 16 (1):7-26.
Descartes, the cartesian circle, and epistemology without God.Michael Della Rocca - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (1):1–33.
Cartesian analyticity.Jesús A. Díaz - 1988 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 26 (1):47-55.
Descartes among the Scholastics.Roger Ariew - 2011 - Boston: Brill. Edited by Roger Ariew.
Argument and Persuasion in Descartes' Meditations.Tom Vinci - 2011 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (4):497-498.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-03-01

Downloads
629 (#27,905)

6 months
108 (#40,542)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references