Statistical significance under low power: A Gettier case?

Journal of Brief Ideas (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A brief idea on statistics and epistemology.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A critique to the significance of Gettier counter-examples.Cao Jianbo - 2006 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (4):675-687.
The Gettier Non-Problem.Stephen Hetherington - 2010 - Logos and Episteme 1 (1):85-107.
I Know I am Not Gettiered.Michael Veber - 2013 - Analytic Philosophy 54 (4):401-420.
Why Gettier Cases are misleading.Moti Mizrahi - 2016 - Logos and Episteme 7 (1):31-44.
A defense of statistical power analysis.Brian R. Lashley - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):209-210.
Précis of statistical significance: Rationale, validity, and utility.Siu L. Chow - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):169-194.
Significance testing – does it need this defence?Günther Palm - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):214-215.
Knowledge, Noise, and Curve-Fitting: A methodological argument for JTB?Jonathan M. Weinberg - 2017 - In Rodrigo Borges, Claudio de Almeida & Peter David Klein (eds.), Explaining Knowledge: New Essays on the Gettier Problem. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Internalism and the Collapse of the Gettier Problem.Timothy McGrew & Lydia McGrew - 1998 - Journal of Philosophical Research 23:239-256.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-19

Downloads
161 (#119,726)

6 months
59 (#80,450)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Dunleavy
Florida State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references