Comparing and combining covert and overt untruthfulness

Pragmatics and Cognition 23 (1):174-208 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper aims to differentiate between lying and irony, typically addressed independently by philosophers and linguists, as well as to discuss the cases when deception co-occurs with, and capitalises on, irony or metaphor. It is argued that the focal distinction can be made with reference to Grice’s first maxim of Quality, whose floutings lead to overt untruthfulness, and whose violations result in covert untruthfulness. Both types of untruthfulness are divided into explicit and implicit subtypes depending on the level of meaning on which they are manifest. Further, it is shown that deception may be based on irony or metaphor, which either promote deceptive implicatures or are deployed covertly. Finally, some argumentation is provided in favour of why these cases of deceiving can be conceptualised as lying.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-09-28

Downloads
40 (#400,484)

6 months
14 (#184,493)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

What Is Lying.Don Fallis - 2009 - Journal of Philosophy 106 (1):29-56.
Lying and Asserting.Andreas Stokke - 2013 - Journal of Philosophy 110 (1):33-60.
The Logical Status of Fictional Discourse.John R. Searle - 1975 - New Literary History 6 (2):319--32.

View all 26 references / Add more references