Is partial compliance with reason always better than non-compliance?

Abstract

Joseph Raz claims that there can be reason to do the impossible; but partial compliance with reason is better than non-compliance and the closer one gets to complying with reason, the better. I propose some exceptions.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Different Perspectives on Cross-Compliance.Stefan Mann - 2005 - Environmental Values 14 (4):471 - 482.
Act and Maxim.Graham Oddie - 1993 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (1):71-92.
From compliance to concordance in diabetes.J. S. Chatterjee - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (9):507-510.
In Defense of Strict Compliance as a Modeling Assumption.Jeffrey Carroll - 2020 - Social Theory and Practice 46 (3):441-466.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-02

Downloads
174 (#112,767)

6 months
90 (#52,969)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references