Must a sign be repeatable?

Abstract

This paper contests a point that Jacques Derrida and John Searle actually agree on, within their infamous debate: that a sign must be repeatable. I focus on a situation involving dissent when evaluating this claim.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Author's Response: The Sign and Its World.Douglas Walter Scott - 2017 - Constructivist Foundations 12 (3):362-368.
Tegn som Språk.Sissel Redse Jørgensen & Rani Lill Anjum (eds.) - 2006 - Gyldendal Akademisk.
Semnul – unitate cu două fețe.Ioan Corjuc - 2018 - Revista de Filosofie Aplicata 1 (1):63-73.
Wittgensteins Kritik am additiven Verständnis des sprachlichen Zeichens.James Conant - 2021 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 69 (1):1-24.
Language is shaped by the body.Mark Aronoff, Irit Meir, Carol Padden & Wendy Sandler - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (5):509-511.
What is a sign?Karl Bühler - 2005 - Kodikas/Code 28 (1-2):19-23.
Bandages.Kelly Oliver - 2014 - Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy 22 (2):70-83.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-07-06

Downloads
228 (#89,842)

6 months
78 (#63,600)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Tacit consent and political obligation.A. John Simmons - 1976 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 5 (3):274-291.
Communication and Writing: A Public Language Argument.Simon Glendinning - 2000 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100 (1):271-286.

Add more references