On the very idea that social anthropology can contribute to the study of specialization

Abstract

I present an argument against the very idea that anthropology can contribute to the study of specialization. But an obvious reply is “Actually anthropologists at home can study specialization.” I provide some details concerning this reply, focusing on incentives to specialize directed at sensitive souls.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The Political Anthropology of Edmund Husserl.Andrzej Gniazdowski - 2018 - Dialogue and Universalism 28 (4):195-214.
Feminist anthropology?Lynn Walter - 1995 - Gender and Society 9 (3):272-288.
On Social Structure.A. R. Radcliffe-Brown - 1940 - Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 70 (1).
Mechanism-based theorizing and generalization from case studies.Petri Ylikoski - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 78 (C):14-22.
The limits of auto-anthropology.Marilyn Strathern - 1987 - In Anthony Jackson (ed.), Anthropology at home. pp. 59-67.
Kant’s Philosophical Anthropology and the Possibility of Living Together with Differences.Özlem Duva Kaya - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 28:37-41.
Anthropology from a Kantian point of view: toward a cosmopolitan conception of human nature.Robert B. Louden - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (4):515-522.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-26

Downloads
103 (#170,658)

6 months
43 (#95,227)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references