What can we hope for from analytic political philosophy? Not sure.

Abstract

I present a difficulty with evaluating analytic political philosophy based on a lack of data to compare achievements there with. For example, if a paradox was (or were) given to members of an elite university college for a day, how many solutions would they come up with?

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Similar books and articles

Craftsmanship, vision, and the other analytic political philosophy.Terence Rajivan Edward - manuscript
Hopes and Dreams.Adrienne M. Martin - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (1):148 - 173.
Hope, Powerlessness, and Agency.Béatrice Han-Pile - 2017 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 41 (1):175-201.
The social organism analogy in British anthropology and analytic political philosophy.Terence Rajivan Edward - manuscript
Political Hope and Cooperative Community.Titus Stahl - 2019 - In Claudia Blöser & Titus Stahl (eds.), The Moral Psychology of Hope: An Introduction (The Moral Psychology of the Emotions). Rowman & Littlefield International. pp. 265-284.
Does Tompkins’ paradox affect women in analytic philosophy?Terence Rajivan Edward - manuscript
The Scoundrel and the Visionary: On Reasonable Hope and the Possibility of a Just Future.Dana S. Howard - 2018 - Journal of Political Philosophy 27 (3):294-317.
Hope in and for the United States of America.John Langan - 2005 - Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics 25 (2):3-16.
Hope as a Political Virtue.Darrel Moellendorf - 2006 - Philosophical Papers 35 (3):413-433.
Political Philosophy, Political Theory, and the Analytic-Continental Divide: A Critical Notice by Andreas Vrahimis of: Across the Great Divide: Between Analytic and Continental Political Theory, by Jeremy Arnold, Stanford University Press, 2020, 232 pp., $29.52 (paperback), ISBN 9781503612150. [REVIEW]Andreas Vrahimis - 2022 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 30 (1):86-101.
Why Hope Cannot Be an Intellectual Virtue: Rationality of Hope Considered from an Analytic Perspective.Elżbieta Łukasiewicz - 2021 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 69 (2):5-37.
Becoming who we are: Democracy and the political problem of hope.Andrew Norris - 2008 - Critical Horizons 9 (1):77-89.
Deleuze and Rorty on hope: Educating hope against neoliberalism.Ting Pei - 2022 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 54 (11):1898-1909.
“The Audacity of Hope”: Reclaiming Obama's Optimism in the Trump Era.Céline Leboeuf - 2019 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 33 (2):256-267.
Antizipation und Hoffnung als Kategorien des Historischen Materialismus.Ernest Mandel & Iron Jinshou - 2009 - Modern Philosophy 4:35-41.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-12

Downloads
97 (#179,157)

6 months
41 (#96,694)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On the apparent paradox of ideal theory.Laura Valentini - 2008 - Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (3):332-355.
On the Apparent Paradox of Ideal Theory.Laura Valentini - 2009 - Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (3):332-355.

Add more references