What “everyone” needs to know? H.L.A. Hart and Scott Soames on reducing liberty

Abstract

This is a two-page handout covering the subtle differences between H.L.A. Hart and Scott Soames on whether the protection of basic liberties would be prioritized using the original position method.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Soames on Frege: provoking thoughts. [REVIEW]Michael Beaney - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (6):1651-1660.
Soames’s Deflationism About Modality.Tuomas E. Tahko - 2013 - Erkenntnis 78 (6):1367-1379.
Truth and meaning redux.Ernie Lepore & Kirk Ludwig - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 154 (2):251-77.
Soames and Zalabardo on kripke’s Wittgenstein.Jussi Haukioja - 2002 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 64 (1):157-73.
Reference and Description: The Case Against Two-Dimensionalism.Scott Soames - 2005 - Princeton: Princeton University Press. Edited by Frank Jackson & Michael Smith.
Soames on Quine and Davidson. [REVIEW]Alex Byrne - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 135 (3):439 - 449.
Evolution of Quine’s Thinking on the Thesis of Underdetermination and Scott Soames’s Accusation of Paradoxicality.M. Ashraf Adeel - 2015 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 5 (1):56-69.
Morality, Law and the Fair Distribution of Freedom.Mario Ricciardi - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (3):531-548.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-07-02

Downloads
165 (#117,546)

6 months
67 (#72,860)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references