An Institutional Duty to Vote: Applying Role Morality in Representative Democracy

Political Theory (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Is voting a duty of democratic citizenship? This article advances a new argument for the existence of a duty to vote. It argues that every normative account of electoral representation requires universal turnout to function in line with its own internal normative logic. This generates a special obligation for citizens to vote in electoral representative contexts as a function of the role morality of democratic citizenship. Because voting uniquely authorizes office holding in representative democracies, and because universal turnout contributes powerfully to representation being fair, to be a good citizen of such democracies requires one to vote. Whereas previous arguments for a duty to vote have invoked basic moral principles like fairness or a Samaritan duty of rescue, this account is based on citizens occupying a vital functional role within electoral representative institutions. This institutional duty solves the “specificity problem” of justifying a duty to vote better than competing accounts and also immunizes the duty to objections that there is no duty to vote when there are only bad choices and that there is a no duty to vote but rather duty to vote well. By emphasizing the tight connection between institutions and individual conduct, the role morality approach used here supplies a less abstract and more realistic framework than much previous research on the ethics of democratic citizenship and brings the debate closer to constitutive features of democratic politics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Merely_ voting or voting _Well? Democracy and the requirements of citizenship.Julia Maskivker - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
An Epistemic Justification for the Obligation to Vote.Julia Maskivker - 2016 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 28 (2):224-247.
A duty not to vote.Paul Sheehy - 2002 - Ratio 15 (1):46–57.
The Ethics of Voting.Jason Brennan - 2011 - Princeton Univ Pr.
Polluting the Polls: When Citizens Should Not Vote.Jason Brennan - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (4):535-549.
Is there a Right not to Vote?Heather Lardy - 2004 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 24 (2):303-321.
Compulsory Voting: For and Against.Jason Brennan & Lisa Hill - 2014 - Cambridge University Press.
Voting and Democracy.Thomas Christiano - 1995 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):395 - 414.
Voter Motivation.Adam Lovett - 2022 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 21 (3).
An Epistemic Case for Positive Voting Duties.Carline Klijnman - 2021 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 33 (1):74-101.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-28

Downloads
44 (#363,054)

6 months
23 (#120,782)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Against Elections: The Lottocratic Alternative.Alexander Guerrero - 2014 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 42 (2):135-178.
The Concept of Representation.Hanna Fenichel Pitkin - 1967 - University of California Press.
Preface.Eric Beerbohm - 2012 - In Eric Anthony Beerbohm (ed.), In our name: the ethics of democracy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Debate: Why Does the Excellent Citizen Vote?Luke Maring - 2015 - Journal of Political Philosophy 24 (2):245-257.

Add more references