Taking Hunger Seriously

Croatian Journal of Philosophy 4 (1):29-57 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An argument is advanced to show that affluent and moderately affluent people, like you and me, are morally obligated: (O1) To provide modest financial support for famine relief organizations and/or other humanitanan organizations working to reduce the amount of unnecessary suffering and death in the world, and (O2) To refrain from squandering food that could be fed to humans in situations of food scarcity. Unlike other ethical arguments for the obligation to assist the world’s absolutely poor, my argument is not predicated on any highly contentious ethical theory that you likely reject. Rather, it is predicated on your beliefs. The argument shows that the things you currently believe already commit you to the obligatoriness of helping to reduce malnutrition and famine-related diseases by sending a nominal percentage of your income to famine relief organizations and by not squandering food that could be fed to them. Consistency with your own beliefs implies that to do any less is to be profoundly immoral.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Food aid and the famine relief argument (brief return).Paul B. Thompson - 2010 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (3):209-227.
The Immorality of Eating Meat.Mylan Engel - 2000 - Chapter in The Moral Life:856-889.
Foreign aid and the moral value of freedom.Martin Peterson - 2004 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (3):293-307.
The Immorality of Having Children.Stuart Rachels - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (3):567-582.
Food Sovereignty and the Global South.Cristian Timmermann & Georges F. Félix - 2012 - In Paul B. Thompson & David M. Kaplan (eds.), Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics. New York: Springer Verlag.
Feast and Famine.Joseph Campisi - 2011 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 18 (2):34-46.
Moral Deliberation and Ad Hominem Fallacies.Uri D. Leibowitz - 2016 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 13 (5):507-529.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-01

Downloads
595 (#30,176)

6 months
136 (#27,586)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mylan Engel Jr
Northern Illinois University

Citations of this work

The Benefit of Regan's Doubt.Robert Bass - 2016 - In Mylan Engel Jr & Gary Lynn Comstock (eds.), The Moral Rights of Animals. Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books. pp. 239-256.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references