AI Successors Worth Creating? Commentary on Lavazza & Vilaça

Philosophy and Technology 37 (1):1-5 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a commentary on Andrea Lavazza and Murilo Vilaça's article "Human Extinction and AI: What We Can Learn from the Ultimate Threat" (Lavazza & Vilaça, 2024). I discuss the potential concern that their proposal to create artificial successors to "insure" against the tragedy of human extinction might mean being too quick to accept that catastrophic prospect as inevitable, rather than single-mindedly focusing on avoiding it. I also consider the question of the value that we might reasonably assign to such a future of artificial successors under the assumption that they do not enjoy phenomenal consciousness.

Similar books and articles

Technological Activity and Philosophical Thought.Zou Qing - 1989 - Chinese Studies in Philosophy 21 (2):32-48.
Response to De Caro, Lavazza, Lemos, and Pereboom.Daniel C. Dennett - 2017 - Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia 8 (3):274-283.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-08

Downloads
96 (#180,732)

6 months
96 (#48,553)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alexandre Erler
National Yang Ming University

References found in this work

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Superintelligence: paths, dangers, strategies.Nick Bostrom (ed.) - 2014 - Oxford University Press.
.Nick Bostrom & Julian Savulescu - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Well-being.Roger Crisp - 2013 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 6 references / Add more references