Actuality and the a priori

Philosophical Studies 175 (3):809-830 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We consider a natural-language sentence that cannot be formally represented in a first-order language for epistemic two-dimensional semantics. We also prove this claim in the “Appendix” section. It turns out, however, that the most natural ways to repair the expressive inadequacy of the first-order language render moot the original philosophical motivation of formalizing a priori knowability as necessity along the diagonal.

Similar books and articles

A cut-free sequent system for two-dimensional modal logic, and why it matters.Greg Restall - 2012 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 163 (11):1611-1623.
Reference, contingency, and the two-dimensional framework.Martin Davies - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 118 (1-2):83-131.
How many notions of necessity?Jordan Stein - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (2):605-627.
Actually, Actually.Seth Yalcin - 2015 - Analysis 75 (2):185-191.
The A Priori‐Operator and the Nesting Problem.Eric Johannesson & Sara Packalén - 2016 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 5 (3):169-176.
Two-Dimensional Tableaux.David Gilbert - 2016 - Australasian Journal of Logic 13 (7).
Expressive power, mood, and actuality.Rohan French - 2013 - Synthese 190 (9):1689-1699.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-03-08

Downloads
716 (#23,069)

6 months
106 (#41,694)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Fabio Lampert
University of Vienna

Citations of this work

Counterfactuals, counteractuals, and free choice.Fabio Lampert & Pedro Merlussi - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (2):445-469.
Actual Issues for Relevant Logics.Shawn Standefer - 2020 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 7.

Add more citations