(β) não dá Base ao Incompatibilismo entre Determinismo e Livre-Arbítrio

Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 75 (3):1951-1976 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Our aim in this paper is to critically assess Peter van Inwagen’s consequence argument for the incompatibility of free will and determinism. This argument is sound only if rule is valid. We present reasons to reject or to be skeptical of the rule and similar rules. So, the consequence argument is not a sound argument for the incompatibility of free will and determinism.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.17990/rpf/2019_75_3_1951

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Consequence Argument and the Definition of Determinism.Christopher Hughes - 2015 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 71 (4):705-724.
Das Konsequenzargument.Christoph Jäger - 2013 - In Rolf W. Puster (ed.), Klassische Argumentationen der Philosophie. pp. 275-296.
What the Consequence Argument Is an Argument For.Justin A. Capes - 2019 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 8 (1):50-56.
Van Inwagen’s Consequence Argument.Michael Huemer - 2000 - Philosophical Review 109 (4):525-544.
Van Inwagen’s Consequence Argument.Michael Huemer - 2000 - Philosophical Review 109 (4):525.
Divine determinism, human freedom, and the consequence argument.Leigh C. Vicens - 2012 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 71 (2):145-155.
Motte-and-Bailey Incompatibilism.Kristin M. Mickelson - manuscript
Mumford and Anjum on incompatibilism, powers and determinism.Penelope Mackie - 2014 - Analysis 74 (4):593-603.
The Incompatibility of Free Will and Naturalism.Jason Turner - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (4):565-587.
So-far incompatibilism and the so-far consequence argument.Stephen Hetherington - 2006 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 73 (1):163-178.
The Consequence argument and the Mind argument.Dana Nelkin - 2001 - Analysis 61 (2):107-115.
The Irrelevance of Indeterministic Counterexamples to Principle Beta.Thomas M. Crisp & Ted A. Warfield - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):173-184.
On behalf of the consequence argument: time, modality, and the nature of free action.Alicia Finch - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (1):151-170.
Against libertarianism.Alicia Finch - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (3):475-493.
What’s wrong with the consequence argument: A compatibilist libertarian response.Christian List - 2019 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 119 (3):253-274.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-29

Downloads
523 (#36,179)

6 months
133 (#29,127)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Domingos Faria
University of Porto

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references