Using Meta‐Scientific Studies to Clarify or Resolve Questions in the Philosophy and History of Science

Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2002 (3):S185-S196 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

More powerful methods for studying and integrating the historical track record of scientific episodes and scientific judgment, or what Faust and Meehl describe as a program of meta‐science and meta‐scientific studies, can supplement and extend more commonly used case study methods. We describe the basic premises of meta‐science, overview methodological considerations, and provide examples of meta‐scientific studies. Meta‐science can help to clarify or resolve long‐standing questions in the history and philosophy of science and provide practical help to the working scientist

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
109 (#162,894)

6 months
10 (#276,350)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Realism and the aim of science.Karl R. Popper - 1983 - New York: Routledge. Edited by William Warren Bartley.
The Limits of Scientific Reasoning.David Faust - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (1):137-138.
The Limits of Scientific Reasoning.David Faust - 1984 - Minneapolis, MN, USA: University of Minnesota Press.

View all 8 references / Add more references