Why little thinkers are a big deal: The relevance of childhood studies to intellectual history

Modern Intellectual History 14 (1):269-280 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Why should intellectual historians care about children? Until recently, the answer was that adults’ ideas about children matter, particularly for the history of education and the history of conceptions of the family, but children's ideas are of little significance. Beginning with Philippe Ariès in the 1960s, historians took to exploring how and why adults’ ideas about children changed over time. In these early histories of childhood, young people figured as consumers of culture and objects of socialization, but not as producers or even conduits of ideas.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,682

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Intellectuals, Tertiary Education and Questions of Difference.Peter Roberts - 2007 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 39 (5):480-493.
Intellectuals, tertiary education and questions of difference.Peter Roberts - 2007 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 39 (5):480–493.
Enlightenment shadows.Genevieve Lloyd - 2013 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy: Volume I.Daniel Garber & Steven M. Nadler (eds.) - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press UK.
Plato On Children and Childhood.Walter Kohan - 2005 - Childhood and Philosophy 1 (1):11-32.
Women Philosophers of the Seventeenth Century.Jacqueline Broad - 2002 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-04-24

Downloads
21 (#752,853)

6 months
5 (#686,768)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references