- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Potential Iatrogenic Effects of Returning Individual Research Results from Digital Phenotyping in Psychiatry
American Journal of Bioethics 24 (2):110-112 (2024)
Abstract
Shen et al. (2024) provide a valuable framework for returning IRRs from digital phenotyping (hereafter IRRs) and note its potential for negative effects (through fueling public- and/or self-stigma)...Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Return of Results in Digital Phenotyping: Ethical Considerations for Real-World Use Cases.John Torous & Charlotte Blease - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (2):91-93.
Contending with Real and Perceived Intrusiveness in Digital Phenotyping Research.Josianne Barrette-Moran & Charles Dupras - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (2):108-110.
Psychiatry, Ethics, and Digital Phenotyping: Moral Challenges and Considerations for Returning Mental Health Research Results to College Students.Craig W. McFarland, Makenna E. Law, Ivan E. Ramirez, Ithika S. Senthilnathan & Kelisha M. Williams - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (2):105-108.
Balancing the Double-Edged Implications of AI in Psychiatric Digital Phenotyping.Katherine Bassil - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (2):113-115.
Respecting the Value-Laden Nature of Participant Preferences: AI, Digital Phenotyping, and Psychiatry.Bryan Pilkington, Jack Noto, Daniel Silverstein & Charles E. Binkley - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (2):93-96.
Returning Individual Research Results from Digital Phenotyping in Psychiatry.Francis X. Shen, Matthew L. Baum, Nicole Martinez-Martin, Adam S. Miner, Melissa Abraham, Catherine A. Brownstein, Nathan Cortez, Barbara J. Evans, Laura T. Germine, David C. Glahn, Christine Grady, Ingrid A. Holm, Elisa A. Hurley, Sara Kimble, Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz, Kimberlyn Leary, Mason Marks, Patrick J. Monette, Jukka-Pekka Onnela, P. Pearl O’Rourke, Scott L. Rauch, Carmel Shachar, Srijan Sen, Ipsit Vahia, Jason L. Vassy, Justin T. Baker, Barbara E. Bierer & Benjamin C. Silverman - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (2):69-90.
First-person disavowals of digital phenotyping and epistemic injustice in psychiatry.Stephanie K. Slack & Linda Barclay - 2023 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 26 (4):605-614.
Personalized Roadmaps for Returning Results From Digital Phenotyping.Kristin Marie Kostick-Quenet, John Herrington & Eric A. Storch - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (2):102-105.
Digital/computational phenotyping: What are the differences in the science and the ethics?Nina Hallowell & Federica Lucivero - 2021 - Big Data and Society 8 (2).
For what it's worth. Unearthing the values embedded in digital phenotyping for mental health.Gabrielle Samuel, Federica Lucivero, Anna Lavis & Rasmus Birk - 2021 - Big Data and Society 8 (2).
The Digital Phenotyping Project: A Psychoanalytical and Network Theory Perspective.Rémy Potier - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 11.
Digital Phenotyping: an Epistemic and Methodological Analysis.Simon Coghlan & Simon D’Alfonso - 2021 - Philosophy and Technology 34 (4):1905-1928.
Incidental Findings from Deep Phenotyping Research in Psychiatry: Legal and Ethical Considerations.Amanda Kim, Michael Hsu, Amanda Koire & Matthew L. Baum - 2022 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 31 (4):482-486.
Navigating the Ethical Maze in Digital Health Research.Camille Nebeker - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (2):99-102.
Digital phenotyping and the (data) shadow of Alzheimer's disease.Natassia Brenman, Alessia Costa & Richard Milne - 2022 - Big Data and Society 9 (1).
Analytics
Added to PP
2024-02-02
Downloads
10 (#1,198,690)
6 months
10 (#276,350)
2024-02-02
Downloads
10 (#1,198,690)
6 months
10 (#276,350)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
Returning Individual Research Results from Digital Phenotyping in Psychiatry.Francis X. Shen, Matthew L. Baum, Nicole Martinez-Martin, Adam S. Miner, Melissa Abraham, Catherine A. Brownstein, Nathan Cortez, Barbara J. Evans, Laura T. Germine, David C. Glahn, Christine Grady, Ingrid A. Holm, Elisa A. Hurley, Sara Kimble, Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz, Kimberlyn Leary, Mason Marks, Patrick J. Monette, Jukka-Pekka Onnela, P. Pearl O’Rourke, Scott L. Rauch, Carmel Shachar, Srijan Sen, Ipsit Vahia, Jason L. Vassy, Justin T. Baker, Barbara E. Bierer & Benjamin C. Silverman - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (2):69-90.
Fair Subject Selection Procedures Must Consider Scientific Uncertainty and Variability in Risk and Benefit Perception.Charles Dupras & Elise Smith - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (2):33-35.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-rskd8 uwo