Defending the Defense

Mind 108 (431):563-566 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

My hunch has always been that in the end, Fregeanism will defeat Millianism. So I suspect that my (1998) arguments on behalf of Millianism are flawed. Peter Graham (1999) is confident he has found the flaws, but he has not. I hope that some clarification will encourage others to reveal the errors.

Similar books and articles

Absolutism vs. Relativism in Contemporary Ontology.Robert F. Allen - 1998 - Journal of Philosophical Research 23:343-352.
Defending Millian Theories.Bryan Frances - 1998 - Mind 107 (428):703-728.
Puzzles on defending others from aggression.Eduardo Rivera-López - 2005 - Law and Philosophy 25 (3):377-386.
A pragmatic defense of Millianism.Arvid Båve - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 138 (2):271 - 289.
Defending Anarchy. [REVIEW]Haim Marantz - 2002 - Radical Philosophy Review 5 (1-2):193-199.
Beyond Millianism.Leo Iacono - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 140 (3):423 - 436.
Defending millianism.Peter J. Graham - 1999 - Mind 108 (431):555-561.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
427 (#46,721)

6 months
73 (#67,161)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

A Test for Theories of Belief Ascription.B. Frances - 2002 - Analysis 62 (2):116-125.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Import of the Puzzle About Belief.David Sosa - 1996 - Philosophical Review 105 (3):373-402.
Defending Millian Theories.Bryan Frances - 1998 - Mind 107 (428):703-728.
Defending millianism.Peter J. Graham - 1999 - Mind 108 (431):555-561.

Add more references