Gettier’s Classic Irrelevance

Abstract

Edmund Gettier’s three-page article is generally regarded as a classic of epistemology. I argue that Gettier cases depend upon three false assumptions and are irrelevant to the theory of knowledge. I suggest that we follow Karl Popper in abandoning subject-centred epistemologies in favour of theories of objective knowledge.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Competence to know.Lisa Miracchi - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (1):29-56.
What Should a Theory of Knowledge Do?Elijah Chudnoff - 2011 - Dialectica 65 (4):561-579.
Knowledge and the Gettier Problem.Stephen Cade Hetherington - 2016 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
A critique to the significance of Gettier counter-examples.Cao Jianbo - 2006 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (4):675-687.
Is knowledge justified true belief?John Turri - 2012 - Synthese 184 (3):247-259.
Fallibilism and the Value of Knowledge.Michael Hannon - 2014 - Synthese 191 (6):1119-1146.
There Is No Knowledge From Falsehood.Ian Schnee - 2015 - Episteme 12 (1):53-74.
Gettier problems.Stephen Hetherington - 2005 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Non-Pickwickian Belief and 'the Gettier Problem'.John Biro - 2017 - Logos and Episteme 8 (1):47-69.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-08-28

Downloads
157 (#122,142)

6 months
20 (#132,313)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references